Raphael Perot vs Daniil Glinka Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

In the domain of second serve performance over the past six months, Glinka has secured victory in 43.92% of points, while Perot has achieved a higher 46.74%. This statistic bears a strong correlation with match prediction accuracy, indicating Perot's potential edge in this aspect.

The return game statistics present a contrasting view. Glinka has prevailed in 42.58% of their opponent's second serve points, compared to Perot's 34.72%. These figures, alongside first serve return stats of 22.65% for Glinka and 34.67% for Perot, paint a comprehensive picture of their relative strengths in return games.

Examining break point conversion in recent performance, Glinka has converted 31.52% of opportunities while Perot's rate stands at a notable 46.67%. This is a crucial metric for live betting when assessing who is more likely to seize chances during the match.

In terms of handling pressure, Glinka has excelled by saving 54.36% of breakpoints, surpassing Perot's 33.33% success rate. This ability to ward off breakpoints can influence in-game predictions significantly.

Analyzing overall performance during the past year, Glinka has claimed wins in 63.24% of matches (43 wins and 25 losses), while Perot boasts a higher win rate of 73.33% (11 wins and 4 losses). When considering the players' histories, these win/loss records provide an insight into their comparative form.

Surface preferences further differentiate the players. Both competitors exhibit their peak performance on indoor hard courts, with Glinka winning 57% of their games on this surface and Perot an impressive 100%. However, on clay, their success rates differ, with Glinka winning 47% and Perot 57% of matches.

Player level and opponent quality are also telling. Glinka and Perot have participated predominantly in Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K tournaments, where they have maintained similar victory rates, Glinka with 70.37% and Perot with 73.33%. Notably, Glinka faced opponents with an average rank of 433.88, while Perot's challengers were ranked at an average of 271.6, indicating Perot's experience against tougher competition.

The deciding set performance over the last year shows Glinka winning 53% of such sets, whereas Perot has secured only 33%. This could be pivotal if the match progresses to a decisive set.

Considering these comprehensive stats, Perot exhibits a slight edge in many areas, particularly in serving aspects and recent performance consistency. Thus, based on current data, Perot is likely to be the favored player in this head-to-head match.